rule-definition-patterns

Define reusable rules for monitoring events and triggering context-aware messages via YAML frontmatter.

Updated May 11, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/AvaTar-ArTs/my-supremepowers --skill rule-definition-patterns
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: rule-definition-patterns
Source: https://github.com/AvaTar-ArTs/my-supremepowers/tree/main/skills/rule-definition-patterns
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/AvaTar-ArTs/my-supremepowers --skill rule-definition-patterns

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This guidance helps teams design clear, reusable rules for monitoring events and displaying appropriate messages when triggers occur, reducing ambiguity and manual configuration.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Pattern-based triggers: define event types (bash, file, stop, prompt, all) and their associated messages.
  • Multi-condition support: specify conditions to refine when a rule fires.
  • Workflow integration: plug rules into existing monitoring or automation pipelines for consistent responses.

Quick Start

Create a simple rule file with a name, an event type, and a regex pattern to trigger a message.

Frequently Asked Questions about rule-definition-patterns

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I define event-driven rules that trigger messages when conditions are met?

To define event-driven rules, you create a configuration using YAML frontmatter with fields like name, enabled, event, and optional conditions, alongside a descriptive message body that triggers when specified criteria are met.

What event types can I monitor using pattern-matching rules?

You can monitor event types including bash, file, stop, prompt, and all, applying single or multiple pattern-matching conditions to refine exactly when a context-aware message is triggered.

Can I apply multiple conditions to a single rule trigger?

Yes, rules support multi-condition matching. You specify multiple conditions within the YAML frontmatter to precisely refine when an event triggers its corresponding message body.

What's the best way to integrate event triggers into an existing automation pipeline?

The best way to integrate event triggers is by defining reusable rules with YAML frontmatter, plugging them into existing monitoring pipelines to ensure consistent, context-aware responses across workflows.

Do I need any dependencies to define event-driven monitoring rules?

No dependencies are required to define event-driven monitoring rules. The implementation relies entirely on YAML frontmatter configuration to specify event triggers, conditions, and messages.