runtime-log-review

Runtime log review applies a disciplined workflow to parse structured JSON outputs and surface actionable insights for operator-facing debugging rather than raw data dumps. It distinguishes committed truth from projections to generate concise summaries.

Auditing runtime logs for incident postmortems involves applying a guided workflow with an audit trail to parse query-session and retrieval-trace logs. This surfaces provenance tracing and grounded answers needed for governance reviews.

Provenance tracing during a runtime log review uses a guided escalation workflow to distinguish artifact-aware committed truth from projections. It parses structured JSON outputs to trace retrieval paths and surface grounded answers.

Yes, local file access to the runtime/logs directory is required to parse structured JSON outputs during a runtime log review. This access allows the operator-focused workflow to refresh or audit log surfaces effectively.

Yes, the runtime log review workflow explicitly supports governance reviews across DocMason runtime activity by applying an audit trail. It evaluates query-session and retrieval-trace logs to provide artifact-aware governance insights.

Limitations during runtime log debugging include the strict requirement for local file access to runtime/logs and the ability to parse structured JSON outputs. Without proper structured data, the artifact-aware review and provenance escalation cannot function.