s-requirements-review-council

You can peer-review an RFC by coordinating a multi-agent Claude council that deploys parallel subagents with focused lenses to analyze the document, followed by a moderator synthesis to consolidate findings into a final verdict.

Stress-testing a strategic technical decision is best handled by a multi-agent council operating in debate mode, deploying parallel Claude subagents to evaluate the approach from focused lenses before a moderator synthesizes a final verdict.

Yes, you can review self-contained materials like PRDs and technical approaches without repository access because the Claude council operates strictly on provided document text and enforces non-use of external tools.

A parallel subagent council synthesizes document review findings by executing structured Round 1 and Round 2 evaluations with focused lenses, then passing the results to a moderator agent that enforces strict prompt structure to produce a consolidated output.

Yes, the Claude council supports doc-review, technical-review, and debate modes specifically for validating skill files, RFCs, and PRDs through parallel lenses and moderator synthesis.

You should avoid using a multi-agent council for document review if your materials are not self-contained or require external tool usage, as the council operates strictly without repository access and enforces non-use of external tools.