s-requirements-review-subagents

To run a cross-model peer review, coordinate parallel Gemini and Claude lenses to assess your requirements document, then synthesize the findings by section and severity into a final verdict with prioritized recommendations.

Multi-model requirements review uses Gemini and Claude lenses in parallel to assess completeness, clarity, and risk in Functional and Technical sections, aggregating findings into a consolidated verdict.

Yes, Codex can be optionally enabled to draft Technical sections during the requirements review, but it remains off by default while Gemini and Claude lenses run in parallel.

The best way to surface gaps and risks is coordinating multiple AI reviewers to assess Functional and Technical sections, synthesizing findings by section and severity into actionable recommendations.

Yes, the cross-model requirements review verifies that Functional and Technical sections are present, assessing completeness, clarity, and risk before producing a final verdict.

A key limitation is that the review workflow relies on parallel Gemini and Claude lenses to synthesize findings, requiring the requirements document to contain distinct Functional and Technical sections for complete assessment.