sanctions-screening-review

Analyze sanctions screening matches and document compliance dispositions.

1|1|Updated Feb 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/GoldenZero/skills --skill sanctions-screening-review-goldenzero
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: sanctions-screening-review
Source: https://github.com/GoldenZero/skills/tree/main/skills/sanctions-screening-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/GoldenZero/skills --skill sanctions-screening-review-goldenzero

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes assets (resource) and references (resource) and scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps compliance professionals analyze sanctions screening results, determine true matches versus false positives, and document compliance decisions, ensuring adherence to OFAC and other regulatory requirements.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Sanctions Program Identification: Maps screening hits to specific sanctions programs (OFAC SDN, SSI, CAPTA, EU, UN, etc.).
  • Match Analysis: Provides a structured framework for comparing screened party data against list entries.
  • 50% Rule Application: Guides the assessment of ownership structures to identify indirect blocking obligations.
  • Disposition Determination: Facilitates clear decision-making (Block, Reject, False Positive, Escalate) with documented rationale.
  • Use Case: A compliance analyst receives a screening alert for a new customer. They use this Skill to systematically analyze the match details, check for 50% rule implications, and document their determination that it is a false positive due to differing identifiers, thereby clearing the alert efficiently and compliantly.

Quick Start

Analyze the attached screening hit details for customer 'John Doe' against the OFAC SDN list and determine the appropriate disposition.

Frequently Asked Questions about sanctions-screening-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I analyze OFAC sanctions screening hits and document dispositions?

To analyze OFAC sanctions screening hits, this Skill provides a structured framework to compare screened party data against list entries, apply the 50% rule for ownership structures, and document final dispositions like Block, Reject, or False Positive.

What is the 50% rule in sanctions compliance and when do I need to apply it?

The 50% rule in sanctions compliance requires assessing ownership structures to identify indirect blocking obligations when an entity is owned 50% or more by a sanctioned person. You need to apply it during sanctions screening to ensure accurate risk assessment.

How do I determine if an OFAC SDN screening alert is a false positive?

To determine if an OFAC SDN screening alert is a false positive, use this Skill to systematically compare match details and check differing identifiers against list entries. This structured match analysis helps clear non-matching alerts compliantly.

Does this sanctions screening tool support country-based programs and sectoral sanctions?

Yes, this sanctions screening tool supports country-based programs, sectoral sanctions, and correspondent account sanctions. It maps screening hits to specific programs including OFAC SDN, SSI, CAPTA, EU, and UN lists for comprehensive compliance.

How do I document a compliance decision to escalate a sanctions screening match?

To document a compliance decision to escalate a sanctions screening match, this Skill facilitates clear decision-making with documented rationale. It guides compliance analysts through disposition determination, ensuring Escalate decisions are properly recorded.

What is the best way to perform a sanctions risk assessment for a new customer?

The best way to perform a sanctions risk assessment for a new customer is using a structured framework to analyze screening alerts. This Skill maps hits to specific sanctions programs and documents screening dispositions, ensuring adherence to regulatory requirements.