santa-method

Validate and refine outputs through multi-agent adversarial review with iterative fixes.

3|Updated Apr 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/rlagycks/oh-my-forge --skill santa-method-rlagycks
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: santa-method
Source: https://github.com/rlagycks/oh-my-forge/tree/main/skills/santa-method
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/rlagycks/oh-my-forge --skill santa-method-rlagycks

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses the challenge of ensuring high-quality, accurate outputs by implementing a multi-agent adversarial verification framework that iteratively refines the result until it meets strict quality criteria.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-agent review: Employs two independent review agents to assess generated outputs without shared context.
  • Convergence loop: Iteratively fixes flagged issues until the output passes both reviews or reaches maximum attempts.
  • Use Case: Ideal for publishing critical content, regulatory-compliant documents, or deploying code where correctness is paramount.

Quick Start

Provide the initial output and rubric, then run the review cycle to verify and improve the content.

Frequently Asked Questions about santa-method

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How does multi-agent verification improve quality assurance for high-stakes content?

A convergence loop in multi-agent verification iteratively flags and fixes errors until the output passes both independent review agents or reaches a maximum attempt threshold, ensuring strict quality compliance.

Can I use multi-agent verification for regulatory-compliant documents and code deployment?

Yes, you can use multi-agent verification for regulatory-compliant documents and code deployment, as it is specifically designed for technical, legal, or regulatory contexts where correctness is paramount.

What do I need to provide to start an iterative error correction review cycle?

To start an iterative error correction review cycle, you need to provide the initial output content and a quality rubric, which the independent review agents then use to validate and refine the result.

Is independent agent review better than single-pass validation for technical content?

Independent agent review is better than single-pass validation for technical content because it prevents shared context bias, utilizing an adversarial framework to iteratively eliminate errors until meeting strict criteria.

What happens when multi-agent verification fails to fix errors within the limit?

When multi-agent verification fails to fix errors within the limit, the convergence loop terminates after reaching maximum attempts, returning the last refined output without guaranteed compliance against the rubric.