sar-decision-qa

The SAR quality review process evaluates decision files against FFIEC expectations and internal policies. It analyzes alert chronology, investigation steps, and disposition rationale to identify material gaps and recommend actions like no further action, re-open, or escalate.

A SAR decision file review includes reading alert chronology, investigation steps, evidence, disposition, rationale, posture, and confidentiality controls. The skill validates these components against named SAR rules and FFIEC expectations to ensure regulatory compliance.

Yes, you can use this skill to review financial crime SAR decisions. It requires a SKILL.md file along with associated references, sector overlays, and firm overlays to accurately assess AML regulatory compliance and internal policy adherence.

The best way to automate BSA officer SAR quality assurance is running this skill against your decision files. It streamlines the review process by producing QA findings and recommending routing actions like re-open or escalate based on identified material gaps.

You should escalate a no-SAR decision file when the quality review identifies material gaps in evidence, rationale, or posture. The skill provides a routing recommendation to escalate or re-open based on findings against named SAR rules and internal policies.