sc-evaluate

Evaluate LLM pipeline outputs against gold standard datasets using LLM-as-judge scoring.

19|2|Updated Aug 26, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Tony363/SuperClaude --skill sc-evaluate
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: sc-evaluate
Source: https://github.com/Tony363/SuperClaude/tree/main/.claude/skills/sc-evaluate
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Tony363/SuperClaude --skill sc-evaluate

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the process of evaluating the quality of LLM-generated outputs against a set of predefined standards, identifying weaknesses and suggesting improvements.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated Evaluation: Runs LLM outputs against gold standard datasets and scores them using an LLM-as-judge approach.
  • Performance Analysis: Identifies specific steps or cases where the LLM performs poorly.
  • Actionable Recommendations: Provides concrete suggestions for improving prompts based on evaluation results.
  • Use Case: A team developing a customer service chatbot can use this Skill to rigorously test new prompt variations, ensuring consistent quality and identifying areas for refinement before deployment.

Quick Start

Run a full evaluation of all test cases and pipeline steps using the default judge model.

Frequently Asked Questions about sc-evaluate

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How does LLM-as-judge evaluation work for testing prompt quality?

LLM-as-judge evaluation scores LLM outputs against gold standard datasets across weighted dimensions. It pinpoints underperforming pipeline steps and generates actionable prompt improvement recommendations.

What is the best way to automate LLM evaluation against a gold standard dataset?

Automating LLM evaluation involves running pipeline outputs against gold standard datasets using LLM-as-judge scoring. This identifies weaknesses in specific cases and provides concrete prompt improvement suggestions.

Can I analyze which specific pipeline steps are causing poor LLM output quality?

Yes, performance analysis identifies specific steps or test cases where the LLM performs poorly. It evaluates output quality across weighted dimensions to pinpoint exactly where the pipeline fails.

How do I get actionable recommendations for improving my LLM prompts?

By evaluating LLM outputs against gold standard datasets, the analysis generates actionable prompt improvement recommendations based on identified weaknesses and underperforming test cases.

Does this LLM evaluation approach integrate with PAL and Rube MCPs?

Yes, the evaluation orchestrates LLM pipeline analysis and integrates with PAL and Rube MCPs for advanced performance analysis and automated reporting.

When do I need to run LLM output quality assurance before deployment?

You need LLM quality assurance when testing new prompt variations before deployment, ensuring consistent output quality and identifying areas for refinement against predefined standards.