scaffolding-ctf-engagement

Scaffold authorized offensive-security engagement documentation with rules, scope, and severity rubric.

2|Updated May 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/rocklambros/rcs --skill scaffolding-ctf-engagement
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: scaffolding-ctf-engagement
Source: https://github.com/rocklambros/rcs/tree/main/skills/security/scaffolding-ctf-engagement
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/rocklambros/rcs --skill scaffolding-ctf-engagement

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill turns an authorized offensive-security engagement into a clear pre-flight packet so testing starts only after scope, authorization, and reporting rules are fixed.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Builds a Rules of Engagement, in-scope and out-of-scope inventory, severity rubric, finding template, and proof-of-concept hygiene rules.
  • Handles paid pentests, internal CTF rotations, and bug-bounty workflows with different authorization sources and reporting formats.
  • Prevents common mistakes such as inferred wildcard scope, unsigned authorization, real-data exfiltration, and proof artifacts that persist beyond the engagement.

Quick Start

Ask for an engagement scaffold by providing the engagement type, exact scope, authorizer, time window, team size, deliverable format, and severity model.

Frequently Asked Questions about scaffolding-ctf-engagement

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate a Rules of Engagement document for a pentest?

To generate Rules of Engagement for a pentest, provide the engagement type, exact scope, authorizer, time window, and deliverable format to scaffold the complete pre-flight documentation packet before testing begins.

What is included in a pre-flight offensive security engagement scaffold?

An offensive security engagement scaffold includes a Rules of Engagement document, in-scope and out-of-scope asset inventory, CVSS severity rubric, finding template, and proof-of-concept hygiene rules to enforce authorized testing.

Can I use an automated scaffold for internal CTF rotations and bug bounty submissions?

Yes, you can use an automated scaffold for internal CTF rotations and bug bounty submissions by specifying the engagement type and defining different authorization sources and reporting formats to match each workflow requirement.

Why do I need explicit authorization and tamper-evident logging before running test traffic?

You need explicit authorization and tamper-evident logging to prevent unsigned authorization mistakes, ensure canary-only data access, and enforce strict rules against real-data exfiltration, pivoting, and persistence during the engagement.

What are the limitations of using inferred wildcard scope during a red team engagement?

Inferred wildcard scope limitations include the risk of unauthorized testing of out-of-scope assets, which this scaffolding process prevents by requiring exact in-scope assets and a defined time window before authorizing test traffic.