What problem does it solve? Choosing between competing architectural approaches often relies on gut feel or incomplete analysis. This Skill produces a rigorous, multi-dimensional comparison of 2-4 scenarios so teams can make defensible architecture decisions backed by cost, technical, and risk data. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Parallel Multi-Dimensional Analysis: Launches three agents simultaneously to evaluate financial (TCO, ROI, sensitivity), technical (complexity, lock-in, scalability), and risk/timeline dimensions of each scenario. - Weighted Decision Matrix: Combines all findings into a scored matrix with adjustable criteria weights and produces a clear recommendation with trade-offs and go/no-go criteria. - Use Case: When deciding between a cloud-native rebuild, lift-and-shift, or hybrid migration, run the comparison to get side-by-side 3-year TCO, risk scores, timeline estimates, and a justified recommendation for an architecture governance board. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to compare cloud-native rebuild versus lift-and-shift versus hybrid migration using the scenario-compare skill.