scenario-gen

Generate adversarial scenarios to stress-test physical AI policies.

17|8|Updated Apr 7, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/nebius/nebius-physical-ai --skill scenario-gen-nebius
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: scenario-gen
Source: https://github.com/nebius/nebius-physical-ai/tree/main/skills/tools/scenario-gen
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/nebius/nebius-physical-ai --skill scenario-gen-nebius

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill addresses the difficulty of identifying edge-case failures in physical AI policies by automating the generation of adversarial scenarios that maximize policy violation rates.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Adversarial Mining: Uses RL-based or heuristic-based agents to perturb environments and surface hard-case failures for regression testing.
  • Automated Ranking: Scores generated scenarios based on failure severity and diversity to prioritize hardening efforts.
  • Visualization: Integrates with Rerun to provide visual heatmaps and time-series analysis of policy failures.
  • Use Case: A robotics team can use this to automatically generate a set of challenging corner-case scenarios for a navigation policy, rank them by severity, and feed the results into a retraining loop.

Quick Start

Use the scenario-gen skill to generate an adversarial set for the policy located at the specified S3 URI and save the results to the output path.

Frequently Asked Questions about scenario-gen

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate adversarial scenarios to find edge-case failures in physical AI policies?

Adversarial scenario generation uses RL-based or heuristic-based agents to perturb environments and surface hard-case failures for regression testing. This skill automates that process, maximizing policy violation rates to identify edge-case failures.

How does automated severity ranking work for physical AI policy failures?

Automated severity ranking scores generated adversarial scenarios based on failure severity and diversity. This scoring mechanism prioritizes hardening efforts by highlighting the most critical policy violations discovered during simulation.

Can I use Isaac Lab reinforcement learning to stress-test robotics navigation policies?

Yes, Isaac Lab RL is supported as a pluggable backend for training adversarial agents. The skill orchestrates end-to-end workflows to stress-test and harden physical AI policies against navigation and other failure modes.

What is the best way to visualize physical AI policy failures during simulation?

Visualizing physical AI policy failures is handled through Rerun integration, which provides visual heatmaps and time-series analysis. These artifacts help analyze how policies break down under adversarial scenario conditions.

Does scenario generation support deterministic environments without reinforcement learning?

Yes, the skill supports heuristic search as a pluggable backend for deterministic environments. This allows you to generate adversarial scenarios without requiring reinforcement learning, ensuring deterministic reproducibility.

How do I feed adversarial scenario results into a robotics policy retraining loop?

You generate an adversarial set for your target policy, rank the scenarios by failure severity, and save the results to an output path. These ranked failure scenarios can then be fed directly into a retraining loop.