scenario

Design tool-agnostic end-to-end test scenarios for real-world workflows.

3|1|Updated Dec 5, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/trungdo9/ClauKit --skill scenario-trungdo9
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: scenario
Source: https://github.com/trungdo9/ClauKit/tree/main/skills/software/scenario
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/trungdo9/ClauKit --skill scenario-trungdo9

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill empowers users to create real-world test scenarios without being tied to specific execution tools, streamlining the testing and debugging process.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Design Real-World Scenarios: Craft user journeys, role-based flows, and recovery paths in a tool-agnostic manner.
  • Scenario Types: Covers system golden paths, role-based testing, negative and recovery scenarios, data-driven tests, and boundary conditions.
  • Design Process: Guides through actor extraction, mapping the happy path, branching unhappy paths, enumerating roles, adding boundaries, and recovery scenarios.
  • Tool Mapping: Provides a clear mapping to different tools like pytest, JUnit, Postman, Playwright, and Cypress.

Quick Start

Design test scenarios for your new feature by using the 'create-scenario' command with the appropriate context and parameters.

Frequently Asked Questions about scenario

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I design end-to-end test scenarios for comprehensive system validation?

To design end-to-end test scenarios, you extract actors, map the happy path, branch into unhappy paths, enumerate roles, and add boundary conditions to validate real-world workflows across all system aspects.

What is scenario-based testing and when do I need it for user journeys?

Scenario-based testing documents real-world user journeys and role-based flows independently of execution tools. You need it to ensure comprehensive coverage of system golden paths, negative paths, and recovery scenarios before tool mapping.

Can I map tool-agnostic test scenarios to specific frameworks like Playwright and Cypress?

Yes, you can map tool-agnostic test scenarios to specific frameworks. The design process provides clear mapping to popular execution tools including pytest, JUnit, Postman, Playwright, and Cypress for implementation.

What's the best way to structure role-based testing and recovery scenarios?

The best way to structure role-based testing and recovery scenarios is following a guided design process: extract actors, map the happy path, enumerate roles, branch unhappy paths, and systematically add recovery paths and boundary conditions.

Does this approach support data-driven tests and boundary condition scenarios?

Yes, this approach fully supports data-driven tests and boundary condition scenarios. It covers system golden paths, role-based testing, negative scenarios, recovery paths, and boundary conditions for comprehensive real-world workflow validation.