scholar-evaluation

Evaluate scholarly work with structured scoring and actionable feedback.

74|5|Updated Dec 10, 2025

Search Tags:#literature review #academic review #research paper #peer review #scoring rubric #publication readiness #scholar evaluation

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/dralkh/seerai --skill scholar-evaluation-dralkh

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: scholar-evaluation
Source: https://github.com/dralkh/seerai/tree/main/skills/scholar-evaluation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/dralkh/seerai --skill scholar-evaluation-dralkh

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires requests, python-dotenv, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you evaluate scholarly work in a consistent, structured way instead of relying on vague impressions or ad hoc review notes.

Core Features & Use Cases

Dimension-by-Dimension Review: Assess problem formulation, literature review, methodology, data collection, analysis, results, writing, and citations.
Quantitative Scoring: Assign 1-5 ratings and combine them into an overall quality assessment using weighted scoring.
Actionable Feedback: Produce strengths, weaknesses, and prioritized recommendations for revision or publication readiness.
Use Case: A researcher can use this Skill to review a draft paper before submission, identify weak methodology or citation gaps, and generate a concise improvement plan.

Quick Start

Use the scholar-evaluation skill to assess this research paper and return a dimension-by-dimension score with prioritized revision feedback.

Frequently Asked Questions about scholar-evaluation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I structure a peer review of a research paper with quantitative scoring?▼

You can structure a peer review by applying the ScholarEval framework to assess research papers across dimensions like problem formulation, methodology, data collection, and citations using weighted 1-5 ratings to generate an overall quality assessment.

What is the best way to evaluate publication readiness for an academic draft?▼

Evaluating publication readiness involves scoring each section of an academic draft against a detailed reference rubric, assigning 1-5 ratings across dimensions, and producing prioritized revision recommendations to identify weak methodology or citation gaps.

Can I use a scoring rubric for literature reviews and academic proposals?▼

Yes, the ScholarEval framework applies to literature reviews, proposals, theses, and other academic writing, evaluating problem formulation, analysis, results, and writing using reproducible weighted scoring rubrics.

How do I turn subjective peer review notes into actionable feedback?▼

You can transform subjective review notes into actionable feedback by using structured scoring rubrics that assign quantitative ratings across dimensions and generate prioritized strengths, weaknesses, and improvement plans.

Does this academic review approach support reproducible assessments across different papers?▼

Yes, reproducible assessments are supported through consistent dimension-by-dimension evaluation using the ScholarEval framework, detailed reference rubrics, and optional score aggregation scripts that ensure weighted ratings remain standardized.