scholar-evaluation

Evaluate scholarly work against ScholarEval quality dimensions and produce structured scores and feedback.

Updated May 24, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Estrella-231/Mathematical_modeling_tongmeng --skill scholar-evaluation-estrella-231
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: scholar-evaluation
Source: https://github.com/Estrella-231/Mathematical_modeling_tongmeng/tree/main/.agents/skills/scholar-evaluation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Estrella-231/Mathematical_modeling_tongmeng --skill scholar-evaluation-estrella-231

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you evaluate scholarly work in a structured, evidence-based way so you can identify quality gaps across research formulation, methods, analysis, and writing, then turn them into concrete next steps.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Dimension-based assessment with scoring across problem formulation, literature review, methodology, data, analysis, results, writing, and citations.
  • Actionable feedback reports that summarize strengths, critical issues, and prioritized recommendations.
  • Optional quantitative score aggregation using an included scoring calculator for consistent revision tracking.

Quick Start

Use scholar-evaluation to score and review a research paper you uploaded, referencing ScholarEval dimensions and returning a structured assessment with prioritized fixes.

Frequently Asked Questions about scholar-evaluation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate a research paper using a structured rubric?

To evaluate a research paper using a structured rubric, assess it against quality dimensions like problem formulation, methodology, and analysis, then generate structured scores and actionable reviewer feedback for targeted revisions.

What is included in a scholarly peer review rubric for academic writing?

A scholarly peer review rubric for academic writing includes dimensions for problem formulation, literature review, methodology, data, analysis, results, writing, and citations, evaluated to produce prioritized recommendations and actionable feedback.

How do I get actionable feedback on my literature review methodology?

You get actionable feedback on your literature review methodology by scoring the work against quality dimensions to identify critical issues and strengths, resulting in a structured assessment with prioritized fixes.

Can I use a weighted scoring calculator for consistent research proposal assessment?

Yes, you can use an optional quantitative weighted scoring calculator for consistent research proposal assessment, aggregating scores across evaluation dimensions to track revisions effectively.

Does the ScholarEval framework support comprehensive review workflows for abstracts?

Yes, the ScholarEval framework supports both targeted and comprehensive review workflows for abstracts, satisfying dimension rubric alignment to produce structured scores and actionable reviewer feedback.