scholar-evaluation

Evaluate scholarly work with structured criteria and weighted scoring.

Updated Jul 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jasrajtulsi/GRAD-SCOPE --skill scholar-evaluation-jasrajtulsi
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: scholar-evaluation
Source: https://github.com/jasrajtulsi/GRAD-SCOPE/tree/main/.claude/skills/scholar-evaluation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jasrajtulsi/GRAD-SCOPE --skill scholar-evaluation-jasrajtulsi

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires requests, python-dotenv, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill removes the guesswork from reviewing scholarly work by giving you a structured way to assess research quality, identify weaknesses, and turn critique into actionable revision guidance.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Dimension-by-Dimension Review: Evaluate problem formulation, literature review, methodology, data, analysis, results, writing, and citations in a consistent framework.
  • Quantitative Scoring: Assign 1–5 ratings and combine them into an overall assessment with clear thresholds for publication readiness.
  • Actionable Feedback: Produce strengths, weaknesses, critical issues, and prioritized recommendations for papers, proposals, theses, and literature reviews.
  • Score Aggregation Support: Use the included calculator to compute weighted totals and generate summary reports from dimension scores.

Quick Start

Use the scholar-evaluation skill to assess the attached research paper against the ScholarEval framework and return dimension scores with prioritized, actionable feedback.

Frequently Asked Questions about scholar-evaluation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate research quality across multiple dimensions like methodology and literature review?

To evaluate research quality, you assess scholarly work across structured dimensions like problem formulation, methodology, analysis, writing, and citations, assigning 1–5 ratings that aggregate into an overall publication readiness score.

Can I use a scoring rubric to generate actionable feedback on an academic draft?

Yes, applying a structured scoring rubric to an academic draft identifies specific strengths, weaknesses, and critical issues, which translates into prioritized recommendations for revising problem formulation and analysis.

What is the best way to aggregate weighted scores for a peer review evaluation?

The best way to aggregate weighted scores for a peer review is using a calculator to combine dimension-specific 1–5 ratings into a weighted total, generating a summary report with clear publication readiness thresholds.

Does this research evaluation framework work for both proposals and literature reviews?

Yes, this research evaluation framework works for proposals, literature reviews, theses, and research papers, consistently evaluating data, results, writing, and citations to produce actionable revision guidance.

How do I assess methodology and citations in a research paper before submission?

To assess methodology and citations, you review the scholarly work against evidence-based criteria, scoring each dimension to identify weaknesses and generate prioritized recommendations before submission.