Verified:GitHub

scholar-evaluation

Evaluate scholarly work across research quality dimensions with quantitative scoring.

2|Updated Feb 2, 2026

Search Tags:#peer review #research evaluation #academic assessment #scholarly writing #feedback generation #methodology critique

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/Weiwei-Mao/hydrology-skills --skill scholar-evaluation-weiwei-mao

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: scholar-evaluation
Source: https://github.com/Weiwei-Mao/hydrology-skills/tree/main/hydrology-skills/scholar-evaluation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Weiwei-Mao/hydrology-skills --skill scholar-evaluation-weiwei-mao

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires numpy, pandas, scipy, scikit-learn, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a systematic framework for evaluating the quality and rigor of scholarly work, offering structured assessment and actionable feedback to improve research output.

Core Features & Use Cases

Comprehensive Assessment: Evaluate research papers, proposals, and literature reviews across multiple quality dimensions (problem formulation, methodology, writing, etc.).
Structured Feedback: Generates quantitative scores and qualitative critiques, identifying strengths and areas for improvement.
Use Case: A research lab lead can use this Skill to provide consistent, high-quality feedback on student papers before submission, ensuring all critical aspects of scholarly work are addressed.

Quick Start

Use the scholar-evaluation skill to evaluate the attached research paper draft.

Frequently Asked Questions about scholar-evaluation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I systematically evaluate research paper drafts for methodology and writing quality?▼

You can evaluate research papers using the ScholarEval framework, which assesses problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and writing to generate quantitative scores and actionable feedback.

What is structured scholarly evaluation and how does it generate actionable feedback?▼

Structured scholarly evaluation uses rubric-based analysis across research quality dimensions to identify strengths and weaknesses, producing quantitative scores and qualitative critiques for iterative improvement.

Can I use peer review tools to provide consistent feedback on student literature reviews?▼

Yes, lab leads can use this Skill to provide consistent, high-quality feedback on student papers and literature reviews before submission, ensuring all critical scholarly aspects are addressed.

How do I critique research methodology and generate quantitative scoring for academic assessment?▼

You can critique methodology and generate quantitative scoring by applying the ScholarEval framework to assess research quality dimensions, providing structured assessment and actionable feedback.

Does scholarly writing evaluation integrate with scientific writing tools for iterative improvement?▼

Yes, scholarly writing evaluation integrates with scientific writing tools to support iterative improvement, allowing researchers to systematically address feedback across multiple quality dimensions.