skills.rest
Wondermonger-daydreaming
Wondermonger-daydreamingCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
𝕏@fireandvisionGitHub

scholar-evaluation

Evaluate scholarly work across multiple dimensions using the ScholarEval framework.

6|1|Updated May 30, 2026
Search Tags:#research#evaluation#reporting#scoring#peer-review#dimensions#scholareval
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Wondermonger-daydreaming/claude-skills-library --skill scholar-evaluation-wondermonger-daydreaming
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: scholar-evaluation
Source: https://github.com/Wondermonger-daydreaming/claude-skills-library/tree/main/skills/scholar-evaluation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Wondermonger-daydreaming/claude-skills-library --skill scholar-evaluation-wondermonger-daydreaming

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Apply the ScholarEval framework to systematically evaluate scholarly and research work using peer-reviewed assessment criteria across multiple quality dimensions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured, dimension-based evaluation across Problem Formulation, Literature Review, Methodology, Data, Analysis, Results, Writing, and Citations
  • Weighted scoring and reproducible reporting aligned with the evaluation_framework rubrics
  • Guidance for applying the framework to papers, proposals, literature reviews, and scholarly writing, with a built-in reference to the evaluation framework

Quick Start

Score your document by supplying per-dimension ratings (1-5) and optional weights, then generate the full ScholarEval report.

Frequently Asked Questions about scholar-evaluation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I systematically evaluate a research paper across multiple dimensions?▼

To systematically evaluate research papers across multiple dimensions, apply the ScholarEval framework to score problem formulation, methodology, data, analysis, and citations, generating a reproducible quality report.

What is the ScholarEval framework for scholarly evaluation?▼

The ScholarEval framework is a systematic method for scholarly evaluation that uses dimension-specific rubrics and weighted scoring to quantify the quality of academic writings, literature reviews, and proposals.

How do I generate a reproducible scholarly evaluation report with weighted scoring?▼

You generate a reproducible scholarly evaluation report by supplying per-dimension ratings from 1 to 5 alongside optional weights, which the framework then processes into a structured assessment output.

Can I use structured peer-review rubrics for research proposals and literature reviews?▼

Yes, you can use these structured peer-review rubrics for research proposals and literature reviews, as the framework explicitly guides assessment for these formats alongside standard research papers.

Does scholarly evaluation require external dependencies to score academic writings?▼

No, scholarly evaluation does not require external dependencies to score academic writings, as the framework relies entirely on its internal references and rubrics to guide the assessment process.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
Hung-3008Hung-3008
1

scholar-evaluation

Evaluate scholarly work with quantitative dimension-based scoring across eight criteria.

Community
Advanced
mrilikecodingmrilikecoding

peer-review

Orchestrate simulated academic peer review with independent reviewer subagents.

Community
Advanced
qinyan-aiqinyan-ai
48

scholar-evaluation

Evaluate scholarly work with weighted dimension scores via calculate_scores.py.

Community
Advanced
travisjneumantravisjneuman
88

statistics-verifier

Verify statistical claims by auditing methodology, significance testing, and bias.

Community
Advanced