scientific-critical-thinking

Evaluate scientific claims by assessing methodology, bias, and evidence quality.

1.8k|100|Updated Jan 17, 2022
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/sonofmagic/weapp-tailwindcss --skill scientific-critical-thinking-sonofmagic
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: scientific-critical-thinking
Source: https://github.com/sonofmagic/weapp-tailwindcss/tree/main/.codex/skills/scientific-critical-thinking
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/sonofmagic/weapp-tailwindcss --skill scientific-critical-thinking-sonofmagic

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps users evaluate scientific claims by scrutinizing methodology, experimental design, statistical validity, biases, confounding, and evidence quality using frameworks such as GRADE and Cochrane risk-of-bias. It guides critical thinking for research appraisal and evidence synthesis.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Methodology Critique: Evaluate study design, validity, confounding control, measurement quality, and appropriateness of conclusions.
  • Bias Detection: Identify cognitive, selection, measurement, and reporting biases; assess preregistration and analytic transparency.
  • Statistical Analysis Evaluation: Assess power analyses, p-values, confidence intervals, effect sizes, missing data handling, and model assumptions.
  • Evidence Quality Assessment: Apply GRADE and ROB frameworks; examine convergence of evidence and context relevance.
  • Use Case: Critically appraise a nutritional epidemiology paper and summarize its strengths, limitations, and practical implications.

Quick Start

Start by providing a research article or abstract and ask for a structured critical appraisal following a standard framework (e.g., methodology critique, bias assessment, and evidence quality rating).