What problem does it solve? Manuscript figures often fail peer review because they are unreadable in greyscale, inconsistent with the data or captions, or stylistically mismatched across the paper. This Skill audits or produces every visual element of a scientific paper so each figure is accurate, legible at print size, and part of one coherent design system. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Review mode: Audits equations, figures, tables, and algorithm listings against the manuscript source, plotting scripts, and data files, then delivers a structured report separating must-fix contradictions from presentation issues. - Production mode: Runs a three-phase workflow (narrative audit, design system, production) with approval gates, generating reproducible matplotlib scripts, vector schematics, captions, and a design log. - Automated quality gates: Bundled scripts check float references and captions in LaTeX, table formatting, text size at print width, palette lightness gaps, greyscale survival, and cross-figure set consistency. - Use Case: Before submitting a journal paper, ask for a review of its figures; the Skill compiles the manuscript, verifies each plotted value against its data source, flags a caption that names a different model variant than the script plots, and reports which figures fail greyscale printing. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to review the figures, tables, and equations in your manuscript folder and report which ones need fixing before submission.