scientific-workflow-tools

Guide scientific research methodology, hypothesis framing, and reproducibility planning.

126|8|Updated Mar 10, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/DrugClaw/DrugClaw --skill scientific-workflow-tools
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: scientific-workflow-tools
Source: https://github.com/DrugClaw/DrugClaw/tree/main/skills/science/scientific-workflow-tools
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/DrugClaw/DrugClaw --skill scientific-workflow-tools

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires python3, and includes scripts (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides structured guidance for improving the rigor, reproducibility, and clarity of scientific research methodologies and outputs.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Hypothesis Framing: Assists in generating testable hypotheses and distinguishing observations from inferences.
  • Manuscript Critique: Offers peer-review style feedback focusing on reproducibility, controls, statistics, and claim scope.
  • Reproducibility Planning: Helps create detailed checklists to ensure studies can be replicated.
  • Scientific Writing Structure: Aids in organizing scientific reports, reviews, and responses to reviewers.
  • Use Case: A researcher is preparing a manuscript and wants to ensure all aspects of reproducibility are covered before submission. They can use this skill to generate a tailored checklist based on their research profile (e.g., 'omics', 'ml').

Quick Start

Generate a reproducibility checklist for an omics research profile and save it to research/omics_checklist.md.

Frequently Asked Questions about scientific-workflow-tools

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I create a reproducibility checklist for my research methodology?

To create a reproducibility checklist, provide your research profile such as omics or ml, and the tool generates a detailed markdown checklist covering study design and methodology rigor for your project.

How do I get peer review feedback on my scientific writing before submission?

For peer review feedback on scientific writing, submit your manuscript to receive critique focusing on reproducibility, controls, statistics, and claim scope to ensure your research is rigorous before submission.

Can I use this tool for hypothesis generation and framing testable hypotheses?

Yes, you can use this tool for hypothesis generation by assisting in framing testable hypotheses and helping you distinguish between scientific observations and inferences during study design.

Does this tool support study design checks for omics and machine learning research?

This tool supports study design checks tailored to specific research profiles including omics and machine learning, generating structured artifacts to verify methodology and reproducibility planning.

What is the best way to structure a scientific report and response to reviewers?

The best way to structure a scientific report is to use the skill's scientific writing structure feature, which aids in organizing reports, reviews, and responses to reviewers into clear formats.

Can I use this skill for patient-level diagnosis or treatment planning?

No, you cannot use this skill for patient-level diagnosis or treatment planning, as it operates strictly within the research domain to provide scientific methodology guidance and reproducibility planning.