scientific-writing

Name: scientific-writing
Availability: InStock
Author: xevos117

Guide structured creation of academic documents with evidence-based writing and citations.

33|7|Updated Feb 7, 2026

Search Tags:#literature review #academic publishing #scientific writing #research paper #citation management #evidence-based writing

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/Xevos117/mcp-zotero --skill scientific-writing-xevos117

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: scientific-writing
Source: https://github.com/Xevos117/mcp-zotero/tree/main/skills/scientific-writing
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Xevos117/mcp-zotero --skill scientific-writing-xevos117

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill streamlines the complex process of writing scientific articles, ensuring a structured, evidence-based approach from initial scope to final delivery.

Core Features & Use Cases

Structured Workflow: Guides users through five mandatory phases: Scope, Search, Read, Write, and Deliver.
Evidence-Based Writing: Emphasizes using specific data from sources and transparently disclosing the depth of source material used (abstract vs. full text).
Use Case: A researcher needs to write a literature review for a grant proposal. This Skill helps them define the scope, find relevant papers, synthesize information accurately, and format the final document with proper citations and disclosures.

Quick Start

Use the scientific-writing skill to write a research paper on the impact of climate change on coral reefs.

Frequently Asked Questions about scientific-writing

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I write a research paper with proper citations and evidence?▼

To write a research paper with proper citations and evidence, use a structured workflow that scopes the topic, searches literature, reads sources, drafts the text, and delivers the document with transparently cited claims. This ensures all factual statements are supported by specific data.

What is the best way to structure a literature review for academic publishing?▼

The best way to structure a literature review for academic publishing is to follow a five-phase workflow: define the scope, search for relevant literature, read and analyze sources, write the synthesis, and deliver the formatted document. This process prioritizes source transparency and evidence-based writing.

How does evidence-based writing ensure source transparency in scientific articles?▼

Evidence-based writing ensures source transparency in scientific articles by requiring all factual claims to be supported by cited evidence and by clearly disclosing the depth of source material used, such as distinguishing between data extracted from an abstract versus a full text.

Can I use this workflow to draft a literature review for a grant proposal?▼

Yes, you can use this workflow to draft a literature review for a grant proposal. The structured process guides you from defining the initial scope to synthesizing information accurately and formatting the final document with proper citations and source disclosures.

Do I need to provide my own sources for citation management during the drafting process?▼

Yes, you need to provide or search for sources during the literature search phase. The workflow guides you through scoping, searching, and analyzing source material to ensure your research paper relies on specific data and transparently disclosed evidence.

How do I know if my scientific writing accurately reflects the depth of my source material?▼

To know if your scientific writing reflects the depth of your source material, ensure the workflow enforces transparent disclosure of whether claims are based on abstracts or full texts. This guarantees that all factual claims are supported by specifically cited evidence.