screenshot-evidence-planner

Define screenshot evidence policies for testing and release workflows.

2|Updated Jul 6, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/nguyenpv1980-wq/Project-Aegis --skill screenshot-evidence-planner
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: screenshot-evidence-planner
Source: https://github.com/nguyenpv1980-wq/Project-Aegis/tree/main/.claude/skills/screenshot-evidence-planner
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/nguyenpv1980-wq/Project-Aegis --skill screenshot-evidence-planner

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill defines which screenshots are worth capturing, how to name and store them, and how to prevent evidence from leaking sensitive or cross-tenant data. It turns scattered, inconsistent screenshots into trustworthy release and test artifacts.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Risk-based checkpoint selection: Chooses evidence-worthy states such as requirement proofs, destructive-action before/after states, permission differences, error states, and defect evidence.
  • Deterministic evidence conventions: Defines sortable naming patterns, required metadata, and linkage to case IDs, PRs, and closeout reports.
  • Masking and retention policy: Mandates block-out masking before storage, sets access rules, and classifies retention by evidence type.
  • Use case: A QA lead needs one shared screenshot policy for manual testing, clickthrough sessions, Playwright failures, and compliance review without exposing customer data.

Quick Start

Ask the skill to design a screenshot evidence policy for your release by providing the consumers, risk points, storage options, and masking requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions about screenshot-evidence-planner

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I create a screenshot evidence policy for QA testing and compliance audits?

A screenshot evidence policy standardizes which QA checkpoints to capture, naming conventions, masking rules, and retention schedules to ensure audit-ready compliance artifacts. It selects risk-justified states like requirement proofs and error states for deterministic capture.

What screenshots should be captured for compliance and release workflows?

Compliance screenshot evidence should capture risk-based checkpoints including requirement proofs, destructive-action before and after states, permission differences, error states, and defect evidence. These checkpoint screenshots must be linked to case IDs and PRs for audit traceability.

How do I mask sensitive data in QA screenshots before storage?

Masking sensitive data in QA screenshots requires mandatory block-out redaction before storage. The screenshot evidence policy enforces pre-storage redaction rules and tenant-access controls to prevent cross-tenant data leakage in compliance archives and test artifacts.

Can I use one screenshot policy for manual QA, Playwright failures, and compliance review?

Yes, a single screenshot evidence policy can cover manual QA, clickthrough sessions, automated Playwright failure artifacts, and compliance review. It applies deterministic naming conventions, metadata standards, and retention rules across all release and audit workflows.

What is the best way to name and store test evidence screenshots for audit traceability?

The best way to name and store test evidence screenshots is using deterministic, sortable naming patterns with required metadata linked to case IDs and PRs. This ensures audit traceability and closeout reporting across release and compliance workflows.

How long should I retain QA screenshots for compliance archives?

QA screenshot retention duration depends on evidence type classification. The screenshot evidence policy sets retention schedules by categorizing screenshots from manual testing, defect evidence, and compliance archives to meet audit and closeout reporting requirements.