sd-feedback

Synthesize supplied reviews and interviews into traceable themes, tensions, and response dispositions.

Updated Jun 26, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/platypeeps/sd-ai-command-pack --skill sd-feedback-platypeeps
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: sd-feedback
Source: https://github.com/platypeeps/sd-ai-command-pack/tree/main/contrib/sd-feedback
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/platypeeps/sd-ai-command-pack --skill sd-feedback-platypeeps

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? Large sets of reviews, comments, interviews, and support conversations are hard to act on: duplicates inflate apparent consensus, minority concerns get averaged away, and requested solutions get mistaken for validated diagnoses. This Skill converts a bounded set of supplied feedback into a traceable atomic ledger, evidence-backed themes, and one provisional disposition per issue. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Atomic feedback ledger: Normalizes every source into atomic entries with stable IDs, exact wording, locators, severity, and source limitations, then deduplicates while preserving raw mention counts. - Theme and tension mapping: Clusters by root concern and affected outcome, preserving contradictions, minority audiences, and isolated high-severity findings instead of forcing consensus. - Disposition recommendations: Assigns exactly one of accept, reject, clarify, test, defer, or already-addressed per issue, with rationale, confidence, and validation actions. - Use Case: After a product launch, feed 40 app-store reviews, 12 support transcripts, and 5 user interviews into the Skill to get a deduplicated theme map showing which concerns affect which audiences and what to validate first. ## Quick Start Use the sd-feedback skill to synthesize the attached customer reviews and interview notes into themes and response dispositions for our onboarding flow.

Frequently Asked Questions about sd-feedback

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I synthesize customer feedback from multiple sources into themes?▼

Supply the reviews, comments, interviews, or transcripts as input and the Skill normalizes them into atomic entries, deduplicates near-identical items, and clusters them by root concern and affected outcome. Each theme links back to its source feedback IDs with raw and deduplicated frequency.

How to handle contradictory feedback from different user audiences?▼

The Skill preserves disagreement explicitly by segmenting conflicting audience needs rather than averaging them into false consensus. Minority findings stay visible, and isolated safety, security, or accessibility concerns are elevated by consequence even at frequency one.

Can this skill reply to reviewers or resolve review threads?▼

No, it is strictly read-only. It never replies to contributors, resolves threads, edits the reviewed artifact, assigns owners, or publishes the synthesis; those actions require a separate authorized workflow.

What is the difference between sd-feedback and sd-receive-review?▼

sd-feedback synthesizes themes across many supplied feedback sources, while sd-receive-review disposes of review findings on the user's own work with one evidenced disposition per finding. Claim verification belongs to sd-fact-check and editorial review to sd-technical-editor.

Why does the skill separate requested solutions from observed problems?▼

A requested solution is evidence about preference or experience, not proof of root cause or technical correctness. Separating observation, interpretation, and proposed solution prevents treating a contributor's suggested fix as a validated diagnosis.

What output formats does feedback synthesis support?▼

It supports format=ledger and format=brief, with brief as the default; both retain the full atomic ledger. The final report includes source coverage, the ledger, theme map, contradictions, dispositions, unresolved items, and a decision-ready summary.