sd-improve-scan

Review target paths against guidelines and generate prioritized improvement lists.

2|2|Updated Jul 10, 2024
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/kslhunter/simplysm --skill sd-improve-scan
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: sd-improve-scan
Source: https://github.com/kslhunter/simplysm/tree/main/.back/260203/sd-improve-scan
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/kslhunter/simplysm --skill sd-improve-scan

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

이 스킬은 대상, 지침, 참고자료를 기반으로 내부 검토를 수행하고 수정 제안을 체계적으로 도출합니다.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 대상 경로의 내용을 지침에 따라 검토하고 문제점을 식별합니다.
  • 참고자료와 지침을 바탕으로 개선 방향과 구체적 수정안을 제공합니다.
  • Use Case: 코드 리포지토리의 특정 패스에 대해 품질 개선 아이디어를 목록으로 제시합니다.

Quick Start

대상 경로와 지침, 참고자료를 입력하면 이 스킬이 검토를 실행하고 수정 제안을 반환합니다.

Frequently Asked Questions about sd-improve-scan

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automatically generate code review improvements for specific repository paths?

To generate code review improvements, provide the target paths along with your guidelines and references. The review workflow identifies actionable changes and returns a prioritized list of fixes with evidence.

What is an internal review runner and how does it suggest fixes?

An internal review runner evaluates target paths against supplied guidelines and references to identify issues. It generates a clear, prioritized list of actionable modifications with supporting evidence without executing code.

Can I use custom guidelines and references to review code quality in my repository?

Yes, you can supply custom guidelines and references to review code quality. The runner applies the review workflow to your target paths and outputs specific improvement suggestions based solely on those materials.

Does the automated review workflow execute tests or run code during analysis?

No, the automated review workflow does not perform code execution or run tests. It relies strictly on the provided guidelines and references to analyze target paths and generate a prioritized list of suggested changes.

What is the best way to systematically identify actionable improvements in internal code contexts?

The best way to identify actionable improvements is to run an internal review using specified target paths, guidelines, and references. This process outputs a clear, prioritized list of modifications with evidence.

Why are specific references needed for suggesting code modifications?

References are needed because the review process relies solely on supplied materials to generate suggestions. They provide the necessary context and standards to ensure the proposed modifications are accurate and evidence-based.