sdd-review

Identify and document correctness, maintainability, and convention issues in code reviews.

48|4|Updated Sep 8, 2025

Search Tags:#maintainability #code-review #correctness #pull-request #review-workflow #linus-style

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/yi-john-huang/sdd-mcp --skill sdd-review

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: sdd-review
Source: https://github.com/yi-john-huang/sdd-mcp/tree/main/.claude/skills/sdd-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/yi-john-huang/sdd-mcp --skill sdd-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill enables teams to perform thorough Linus-style code reviews to ensure correctness, maintainability, and adherence to project conventions after implementation.

Core Features & Use Cases

Structured reviews focused on correctness, simplicity, maintainability, and coding standards.
Workflow guidance covering scope definition, context loading, and actionable feedback.
PR/diff evaluation checks to improve code quality across files and diffs.

Quick Start

Review the latest commit or pull request to identify issues and craft constructive feedback.

Frequently Asked Questions about sdd-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I perform a Linus-style code review on a pull request?▼

A Linus-style code review focuses on identifying correctness, maintainability, and convention issues in pull requests. It uses structured feedback templates to evaluate scope, load project context, and verify code quality across diffs.

What is the best way to review code maintainability and correctness in a directory?▼

Reviewing code maintainability and correctness in a directory requires applying concrete review criteria to files. This process checks simplicity, coding standards, and project conventions to produce actionable feedback.

Can I use structured feedback templates for reviewing single file diffs?▼

Yes, structured feedback templates can be applied to single file diffs. The workflow guides you through scope definition, context loading, and verification to ensure consistent quality and actionable feedback.

Does this code review workflow work with existing project conventions?▼

Yes, the code review workflow evaluates adherence to existing project conventions. It checks code across files and diffs to ensure implementation aligns with project-specific coding standards and maintainability requirements.

What should a code review cover when evaluating a software project PR?▼

A code review for a software project PR should cover correctness, simplicity, maintainability, and coding standards. It guides the reviewer through scope definition, context loading, and actionable feedback generation.

How do code review criteria enforce quality across project diffs?▼

Code review criteria enforce quality by identifying and documenting issues that affect correctness and maintainability across project diffs. This ensures consistent quality by applying structured evaluation steps to every review.