se-doc-review

Review requirements documents from multiple perspectives by orchestrating parallel persona analysis that surfaces role-specific issues across disciplines like coherence, feasibility, design, and security. This multi-persona approach ensures comprehensive coverage of potential document flaws.

Multi-persona document review handles unresolved findings by routing them to a shared Open Questions section. This defers unresolved items for collaborative follow-up rather than forcing immediate resolution during the initial analysis pass.

The best way to classify issues found during plan document analysis is to apply safe_auto, gated_auto, and manual action categories. This classification system routes findings appropriately based on their required level of intervention and automation safety.

Yes, you can generate a synthesized report for stakeholder handoffs after a document review. The process provides a structured presentation with clearly labeled FYI observations to support decision-makers receiving the reviewed requirements.

Yes, this multi-persona analysis approach works for both requirements and plan documents. It operates across various document types to consistently surface role-specific issues and defer unresolved items to Open Questions.