second-opinion

To get a second opinion on code review and planning decisions, provide your user prompt and optional context to the wrapper, which runs Codex in full-auto mode to validate your code, diffs, and design proposals with actionable feedback.

Yes, you can use Codex to review architecture decisions and debug proposals by supplying the relevant context to the wrapper, which processes the conversation logs to provide context-aware guidance and risk reduction before shipping.

For Codex validation on a code diff, you need to provide a user prompt describing the issue and optional context including conversation logs, allowing the wrapper to execute Codex in full-auto mode to deliver actionable feedback.

Getting a Codex second opinion requires the codex dependency installed in your environment, as the wrapper relies on Codex's full-auto mode to process your prompts, context, and logs for plan and code validation.

The best way to integrate Codex insights into your development cycle is using the wrapper to obtain context-aware feedback on plans and diffs, catching gaps and reducing risk before shipping your code.

You should not rely on automated code review when you lack sufficient context or conversation logs to pass to Codex, as the wrapper requires these inputs to generate actionable and accurate validation for your design decisions.