What problem does it solve?
Academic manuscript sections often fail to follow pedagogical and structural standards, making arguments unclear, methods underspecified, or results misaligned with research questions; this Skill systematically detects those issues and proposes sourced revisions.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Adversarial review loop: Runs an inquisitor→clarifier→inquisitor pattern to identify foibles, propose sourced revisions, and re-grade the section.
- Rubric-driven evaluation: Loads section-specific rubrics (intro, data, methods, results, conclusion) and cross-checks adjacent sections for consistency.
- Safe file handling & outputs: Reads QMD and Overleaf .tex files (read-only for Overleaf), caps rounds/costs, and writes a scored revision file to the project's quality_reports directory.
- Use Case: Improve a draft results section by locating specification mismatches with methods, proposing structural fixes with citations, and producing a revision-ready QMD audit.
Quick Start
Run a section-writing-review for the data section on the file 3-data.tex to generate a scored revision report.