security-audit

Run parallel multi-agent security reviews across auth, API, database, and client code.

Updated Mar 28, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/akirschke15-cmd/Cato-Registry --skill security-audit-akirschke15-cmd
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: security-audit
Source: https://github.com/akirschke15-cmd/Cato-Registry/tree/main/.claude/skills/security-audit
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/akirschke15-cmd/Cato-Registry --skill security-audit-akirschke15-cmd

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you catch security weaknesses early and consistently by coordinating a comprehensive code security review before deployment, reducing the risk of vulnerabilities slipping into production.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Parallel multi-agent review with scope separation: Auth/session, API/routers, database access, and client/config concerns are reviewed independently to cover the full attack surface.
  • Actionable, file-referenced findings with severity: Produces concrete findings (with file and approximate line) using CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW/INFO levels, each with recommended fixes.
  • Consolidated audit reporting and optional fix rounds: Merges agent outputs into a single full report with a severity-sorted summary, then (optionally) guides a follow-up fix loop for CRITICAL/HIGH issues without allowing code changes during the audit phase.

Quick Start

Ask the AI to run a security-audit for your repository and generate a consolidated report in docs/security-audit-full.md, then immediately proceed with the fix round for any CRITICAL or HIGH findings.

Frequently Asked Questions about security-audit

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a multi-agent security audit before deployment?

Run a multi-agent security audit by splitting the review scope across auth, API, database, and client config. Agents operate read-only to identify vulnerabilities, generating a consolidated, severity-tagged report for pre-deployment sweeps.

Can I get automated code remediation for critical vulnerabilities?

Automated code remediation is supported via an optional fix round after the audit. The audit phase remains strictly read-only, but you can subsequently guide fixes for CRITICAL and HIGH vulnerabilities and verify them using typechecks and tests.

How does parallel code review work for vulnerability assessment?

Parallel code review for vulnerability assessment works by assigning independent agents to specific attack surfaces like auth/session, API/routers, database access, and client/config. This scope separation ensures comprehensive coverage before merging findings into a single report.

What is the best way to structure a periodic compliance check for a codebase?

The best way to structure a periodic compliance check is using a parallel multi-agent review that tags findings by severity (CRITICAL, HIGH, MEDIUM, LOW, INFO) with specific file references. This produces an actionable, consolidated audit report for compliance tracking.

Does the security audit allow agents to modify code during the review?

The security audit does not allow agents to modify code during the review. Agent behavior is strictly read-only during the audit phase to ensure objective vulnerability assessment, with an optional guided remediation round available only afterward.

Do I need Prisma or specific database tools to perform a database access security review?

You do not need specific database tools like Prisma to perform a database access security review. The multi-agent review evaluates database access concerns within your codebase structurally, requiring only read-only access to identify misconfigurations.