security-lens-reviewer

Identify security gaps in planning documents and output prioritized mitigations.

Updated Mar 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Andreicr1/netz-analysis-engine --skill security-lens-reviewer-andreicr1
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: security-lens-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/Andreicr1/netz-analysis-engine/tree/main/.gemini/skills/security-lens-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Andreicr1/netz-analysis-engine --skill security-lens-reviewer-andreicr1

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Identifies security gaps in planning documents by evaluating plan-level security decisions, attack surface, and threat-model coverage before implementation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Attack surface assessment: inventories new endpoints, data stores, integrations, and inputs to surface missing security considerations.
  • Auth/authz gaps: ensures explicit access control decisions accompany features and endpoints.
  • Data exposure awareness: flags sensitive data handling and protection needs for data in transit, at rest, in logs, and retention.
  • Threat-model guidance: outlines top exploitable risks and mitigation suggestions at the plan level.

Quick Start

Review a planning document to identify security decisions, and generate a prioritized list of security gaps and mitigations.

Frequently Asked Questions about security-lens-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I identify security gaps in planning documents before implementation?

Plan-level security review evaluates planning documents to inventory attack surfaces, flag missing auth/authz decisions, identify sensitive data exposure risks, and outline top exploitable threats. It generates a prioritized list of security gaps and mitigations for early-stage design.

When do I need a threat model and attack surface assessment for architecture reviews?

A threat model and attack surface assessment is needed during early-stage planning and architecture reviews before implementation begins. It inventories new endpoints, data stores, and integrations to surface missing security considerations and ensure explicit access control decisions.

What is the best way to review data protection considerations in product plans?

Reviewing data protection considerations in product plans involves evaluating how sensitive data is handled in transit, at rest, in logs, and regarding retention. This plan-level review flags sensitive data exposure needs and outputs prioritized mitigation suggestions.

Can I use plan-level security review for early-stage risk discussions without existing code?

Yes, plan-level security review applies to early-stage planning and risk discussions without existing code. It evaluates plan-level artifacts containing architectural decisions, inventories the attack surface, and outputs prioritized security findings and mitigations before implementation.

Does plan-level security review work without explicit authentication and authorization decisions?

Plan-level security review requires plan-level artifacts with explicit authentication and authorization decisions to function effectively. Without these explicit access control decisions, the review cannot accurately identify auth/authz gaps or generate prioritized findings.