security-review

This security review identifies exploitable risks in code changes by applying a comprehensive gate-driven review across auth, input, secrets, API, data, concurrency, container, and dependency domains. It presents evidence-backed findings in a structured report with suppression notes and remediation plans.

Yes, this security review supports risk acceptance and suppression workflows by generating explicit suppression notes with rationale and open questions. It outputs structured risk acceptance entries and an uncovered risk list for governance tracking.

The best way to assess exploitability in code changes is using an exploitability-first approach that grounds findings in code, config, and runtime evidence. This method applies comprehensive gates across multiple risk domains to ensure actionable remediation.

Yes, you can adjust vulnerability risk assessment depth using Lite, Standard, or Deep scope options. This scope-based review depth scales the security review process to match the complexity and risk profile of the specific code changes.

Go-specific security gates are applied alongside general security checks across auth, input, secrets, API, data, concurrency, container, third-party, and dependency risk domains. These gates validate code changes using design rationale and scenario checklists.