security-review

Trace untrusted data and verify authorization logic to identify security vulnerabilities.

25|3|Updated Jul 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/nimadorostkar/Claude-Skills-collection --skill security-review-nimadorostkar
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: security-review
Source: https://github.com/nimadorostkar/Claude-Skills-collection/tree/main/skills/security/security-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/nimadorostkar/Claude-Skills-collection --skill security-review-nimadorostkar

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill addresses the gap between theoretical security scanning and actionable remediation by providing a structured, context-aware framework for identifying and fixing real-world vulnerabilities.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • OWASP Top 10 Analysis: Evaluates code against industry-standard vulnerability patterns.
  • Authorization Auditing: Specifically targets object-level access control flaws which automated scanners often miss.
  • Use Case: Use this during a pull request review to identify broken object-level authorization or exposed secrets before code is merged into production.

Quick Start

Perform a security review on the provided codebase focusing on authentication and authorization logic.

Frequently Asked Questions about security-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I audit code for security vulnerabilities and authorization flaws?

Security code review during pull requests identifies object-level authorization flaws and exposed secrets before merging into production. It evaluates code against OWASP Top 10 patterns by tracing untrusted data flows and verifying access control logic.

How do I find broken object-level authorization during a pull request review?

Find broken object-level authorization by tracing untrusted data flows and verifying access control logic manually. This targets object-level access control flaws automated scanners miss, producing severity-ranked findings with concrete exploit paths for remediation.

Can I use this for pre-deployment security assessments and penetration test remediation?

Yes, this applies to pre-deployment security assessments and penetration test remediation. It requires manual analysis of control flow, secret exposure, and dependency risk to produce severity-ranked findings with concrete exploit paths.

What is the best way to evaluate source code against OWASP Top 10 vulnerability patterns?

The best way to evaluate source code against OWASP Top 10 patterns is through structured manual analysis of control flow and secret exposure. This context-aware framework traces untrusted data to bridge theoretical scanning and actionable remediation.

Does automated security scanning work for object-level access control flaws?

Automated security scanning often misses object-level access control flaws. Identifying them requires manually tracing untrusted data and verifying authorization logic to produce severity-ranked findings with concrete exploit paths for remediation.