security-review-owasp-cryptographic-storage

Identify cryptographic storage weaknesses in code, configuration, and architecture.

Updated Mar 26, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/sjinks/ai-owasp-skillset --skill security-review-owasp-cryptographic-storage
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: security-review-owasp-cryptographic-storage
Source: https://github.com/sjinks/ai-owasp-skillset/tree/main/.github/skills/security-review-owasp-cryptographic-storage
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/sjinks/ai-owasp-skillset --skill security-review-owasp-cryptographic-storage

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps reviewers find weaknesses in cryptographic storage and transport protections that could let attackers read, tamper with, spoof, or replay protected data.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Trust Validation Review: Checks certificate, header, endpoint, and peer validation for unsafe implicit trust.
  • Integrity and Replay Analysis: Evaluates encryption, integrity controls, downgrade risks, and replay resistance across channels and message flows.
  • Lifecycle and Deployment Review: Assesses rotation, renewal, revocation, monitoring, and proxy or termination assumptions that can weaken protection.
  • Use Case: Use this Skill when reviewing authentication flows, service-to-service traffic, webhook handling, or TLS termination paths for cryptographic control failures.

Quick Start

Ask this skill to review the specified flow, component, or files for cryptographic storage weaknesses and report confirmed findings with evidence.

Frequently Asked Questions about security-review-owasp-cryptographic-storage

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review cryptographic storage for certificate validation and trust boundary flaws?

Review cryptographic storage by evaluating certificate, header, endpoint, and peer validation for unsafe implicit trust across trust boundaries. This requires concrete evidence and strict validation analysis to identify confirmed weaknesses in channel setup.

What does an integrity and replay analysis check during a TLS security review?

An integrity and replay analysis evaluates encryption, integrity controls, downgrade risks, and replay resistance across channels and message flows. It checks whether protected data can be tampered with or spoofed during secure communications.

How do I assess TLS termination and proxy assumptions for cryptographic control failures?

Assess TLS termination and proxy assumptions by reviewing rotation, renewal, revocation, and monitoring practices that can weaken protection. This lifecycle and deployment review verifies that proxy termination does not expose protected data.

Can I use this security review for authentication flows and webhook handling?

Yes, you can use this security review for authentication flows, service-to-service traffic, webhook handling, and TLS termination paths. It identifies cryptographic control failures by applying strict validation analysis to these specific use cases.

What is the best way to separate confirmed cryptographic findings from review gaps?

The best way to separate confirmed cryptographic findings from review gaps is to require concrete evidence for every weakness identified. This approach distinguishes validated cryptographic storage flaws from areas lacking sufficient information.