security-review-owasp-xss-filter-evasion

Trace attacker-controlled input into browser contexts to detect XSS filter evasion.

Updated Mar 26, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/sjinks/ai-owasp-skillset --skill security-review-owasp-xss-filter-evasion
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: security-review-owasp-xss-filter-evasion
Source: https://github.com/sjinks/ai-owasp-skillset/tree/main/.github/skills/security-review-owasp-xss-filter-evasion
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/sjinks/ai-owasp-skillset --skill security-review-owasp-xss-filter-evasion

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Helps reviewers catch browser-side trust failures that let attacker-controlled content bypass XSS filters, execute in the DOM, or leak sensitive data through weak client-side controls.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • DOM and Rendering Review: Inspect input flow into executable browser contexts, template escape hatches, storage, and postMessage handling.
  • Policy and Boundary Review: Assess CSP, framing rules, mixed-content handling, sandboxing, and other browser-enforced protections for bypasses or inconsistent deployment.
  • Third-Party Risk Review: Evaluate widgets, extensions, scripts, and external dependencies that expand client-side trust or exposure.
  • Use Case: Review a web app’s frontend, response headers, and embedded scripts to determine whether an attacker can inject script, frame sensitive UI, or exfiltrate data across origins.

Quick Start

Use the security-review-owasp-xss-filter-evasion skill to review the target frontend code, headers, and browser interactions for XSS filter bypasses, framing abuse, and unsafe third-party script behavior.

Frequently Asked Questions about security-review-owasp-xss-filter-evasion

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review front-end code for XSS filter evasion risks?

To review front-end code for XSS filter evasion, trace attacker-controlled input into executable browser contexts, inspect DOM sinks, template escape hatches, and browser storage to confirm whether script injection is possible. This process separates confirmed findings from review gaps.

What is a DOM sink and how does it affect browser security?

A DOM sink is a browser context where attacker-controlled input can execute as script. Assessing DOM sinks involves tracing untrusted data flow into these executable contexts during a security review to prevent unauthorized script execution and data exfiltration across origins.

How do I check CSP and framing controls for bypasses?

Checking CSP and framing controls involves assessing browser-enforced protections like Content Security Policy, sandboxing, and framing rules for inconsistent deployment or bypasses that allow framing abuse or mixed-content execution during a web application security review.

Can I use this approach to review third-party scripts and widgets?

Yes, you can review third-party scripts and widgets by evaluating external dependencies, extensions, and embedded scripts that expand client-side trust or exposure to determine if they introduce unsafe cross-origin data leakage or script execution vulnerabilities.

How do I validate trust boundaries in client-side integrations?

Validating trust boundaries in client-side integrations requires evidence-driven tracing of attacker-controlled input through postMessage handling and response headers, verifying that policy and boundary controls effectively prevent execution in unauthorized browser contexts.

What are the limitations of reviewing browser-enforced protections for XSS?

A limitation of reviewing browser-enforced protections is distinguishing confirmed findings from review gaps; inconsistent CSP deployment or mixed-content handling may obscure bypasses, requiring thorough evidence-driven tracing to separate validated vulnerabilities from inconclusive analysis.