security-review

A security review checks code for vulnerabilities like XSS, SQL injection, and CSRF before deployment. It audits authentication, sessions, input handling, and secrets management, applying OWASP-style prioritization to return plain-language findings and actionable fixes for critical, high, and medium risks.

OWASP-style prioritization ranks web security risks by severity, categorizing XSS, SQL injection, and CSRF vulnerabilities into critical, high, and medium levels. This approach ensures critical authentication and secrets management flaws receive plain-language findings and actionable fixes before lower-risk issues.

Auditing a login flow for authentication and session security involves reviewing input handling, output encoding, and cookie configurations. The process identifies weak session management and missing rate limiting, providing clear fixes to prevent unauthorized access and session hijacking.

Yes, you can scan API endpoints for XSS, CSRF, and SQL injection risks. A security review evaluates input handling, output encoding, and headers to detect unsafe web patterns, returning prioritized fixes for critical, high, and medium vulnerabilities found in the code.

Yes, a code security review checks for secrets management and rate limiting gaps. It scans web applications for hardcoded secrets, missing headers, and insufficient rate limits, applying OWASP-style prioritization to deliver actionable fixes for identified critical and high risks.

Automated security reviews for web applications focus on known patterns like XSS, CSRF, and SQL injection but may miss complex business logic flaws. They prioritize critical, high, and medium risks with actionable fixes, requiring human verification for context-specific vulnerabilities.