What problem does it solve? Directors producing short-drama episodes need to verify that storyboard artists' Seedance 2.0 video prompts faithfully inherit the director's shot-level script before generation, but manual checking of dozens of prompts for fidelity, timing rules, dialogue integrity, and asset references is slow and error-prone. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Line-by-line fidelity comparison: Compares each video prompt against the director's shot script (01-导演讲戏.md), flagging weakened, omitted, reordered, or unauthorized additions to core performance, camera work, and emotional beats. - Rule enforcement checks: Validates sub-shot duration limits per genre type, the 15-second priority strategy, merge rules for consecutive short shots, global @image numbering, local asset paths, full character names, and dialogue embedding formats. - Scored verdict workflow: Scores every prompt 1-10 across fidelity, visual accuracy, executability, and audio design, then records an internal PASS/FAIL verdict with a prioritized fix list. - Use Case: After a storyboard artist produces 02-视频提示词.md for episode 3, run this review to catch a missing local asset path, a dialogue line repeated across two S segments, and sub-shots exceeding the 3-second dialogue limit before submitting prompts to Seedance. ## Quick Start Review the Seedance video prompts for episode 03 against the director script and report whether they pass content confirmation.
