self-consistency

Sample multiple reasoning paths and select the most consistent final answer.

226|55|Updated Mar 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Miosa-osa/canopy --skill self-consistency-miosa-osa
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: self-consistency
Source: https://github.com/Miosa-osa/canopy/tree/main/library/skills/ai-patterns/self-consistency
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Miosa-osa/canopy --skill self-consistency-miosa-osa

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Sample and select the most consistent answer from multiple reasoning paths to improve accuracy on tasks with fixed answers.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-path reasoning: generate diverse solution paths and compare outcomes.
  • Majority-consensus: select the most frequent final answer across paths.
  • High-stakes decision support: increases reliability for math problems, logic puzzles, and factual queries where accuracy matters.

Quick Start

Provide multiple reasoning paths for a given problem and return the consensus answer.

Frequently Asked Questions about self-consistency

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I improve AI accuracy on math problems using multi-path reasoning?

Multi-path reasoning improves accuracy on math problems by sampling multiple reasoning paths and selecting the most consistent final answer through majority voting. This approach is applicable to math problems, logic puzzles, and high-stakes factual queries.

What is self-consistency in prompt engineering for high-stakes decisions?

Self-consistency in prompt engineering is an AI pattern that selects the most frequent final answer across multiple paths. It implements a sampling loop to generate diverse outcomes and applies majority voting to determine a reliable result.

When should I use a majority vote consensus for logic puzzles?

Use majority vote consensus for logic puzzles when you need high accuracy and fixed answers. It samples multiple reasoning paths, extracts final answers, and selects the most frequent outcome to increase reliability for high-stakes decisions.

Can I apply chain-of-thought sampling to factual queries requiring high accuracy?

Yes, you can apply chain-of-thought sampling to factual queries requiring high accuracy. The self-consistency pattern samples multiple reasoning paths and uses majority consensus to select the most consistent final answer.

What are the limitations of using majority voting for AI reasoning paths?

Majority voting for AI reasoning paths is limited to tasks with fixed answers, such as math problems and logic puzzles. It is not suitable for open-ended generation tasks where multiple valid answers exist or where no clear consensus can be reached.