Run two-cycle stress reviews with targeted worker corrections for unresolved defects.
npx skills add https://github.com/Jonghakseo/my-pi --skill self-healing-jonghakseo
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: self-healing Source: https://github.com/Jonghakseo/my-pi/tree/main/skills/self-healing Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Jonghakseo/my-pi --skill self-healing-jonghakseo
This Skill reduces defects and unresolved risks by coordinating repeated stress reviews with narrowly scoped worker fixes instead of relying on a single implementation pass.
Ask the self-healing skill to run its two-cycle stress-review and targeted-fix workflow for the specified implementation or task.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Iterative stress reviews expose correctness gaps in complex multi-file changes by applying repeated stress-interview cycles, followed by targeted worker corrections to stabilize the implementation.
Automated code correction for unresolved defects is best handled by an iterative review loop that applies stress testing, triages findings by priority, and executes narrowly scoped worker fixes.
Stress testing in iterative code review works by running stress-interview and worker correction cycles exactly twice, automatically addressing reproducible issues while escalating judgment-dependent risks to prevent uncontrolled iteration.
Pre-review quality checks on multi-file changes require exactly two review cycles, strictly limiting iteration to prevent uncontrolled loops while ensuring actionable items are triaged and scope-controlled fixes are applied.
Triage and document remaining risks after stress testing by classifying findings by priority and fix class, automatically addressing reproducible issues, and explicitly reporting unresolved judgment-dependent risks when the review loop ends.
Yes, you can use Pi subagent tool calls to triage actionable items during code correction, automatically addressing reproducible issues while escalating judgment-dependent risks and limiting scope-controlled fixes to high-value defects.
iliaalPlan software implementation phases using task_plan.md, findings.md, and progress.md files.
pedroscostaFetch unresolved GitHub PR comments, apply feasible fixes, and resolve threads.
dcossonExtract decisions, assumptions, dependencies, and interfaces from technical plans for adversarial review.
Chang-Shih-YungAggregate type checker, linter, and test results into a 0-10 composite score.
