seven-pass-review

Review academic papers using a seven-lens adversarial approach with prioritized revision suggestions.

Updated Jun 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/fredmilhome/laffer_tobacco --skill seven-pass-review-fredmilhome
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: seven-pass-review
Source: https://github.com/fredmilhome/laffer_tobacco/tree/main/.claude/skills/seven-pass-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/fredmilhome/laffer_tobacco --skill seven-pass-review-fredmilhome

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires Read, Grep, Glob, Write, Bash, Task, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This skill addresses the need for a thorough and detailed review of academic papers, providing a multi-faceted analysis that covers various aspects of the paper.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Seven-Lens Review: Conducts a detailed review focusing on abstract, intro, methods, results, robustness, prose, and citations.
  • Forked Subagents: Utilizes parallel subagents for each lens to maintain context clarity.
  • Synthesized Report: Delivers a consolidated review with prioritized revision checklist.
  • Use Case: Ideal for submission-ready or R&R stage papers where a thorough review is critical.

Quick Start

Execute the 'seven-pass-review' skill with the path to your academic manuscript.

Frequently Asked Questions about seven-pass-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct an adversarial academic paper review before submission?

A seven-pass academic paper review analyzes a manuscript across abstract, intro, methods, results, robustness, prose, and citations. It uses parallel subagents to maintain context clarity and synthesizes a consolidated report with a prioritized revision checklist.

What is the best way to analyze manuscript quality and research robustness?

Analyzing manuscript quality and research robustness involves evaluating methodological soundness and result stability. A multi-pass review assesses these dimensions independently, providing targeted feedback to strengthen the paper's overall scientific contribution.

Can I use parallel subagents for paper analysis to maintain context clarity?

Yes, using forked subagents for paper analysis maintains context clarity during the review. Each subagent independently evaluates a specific lens like prose or robustness, ensuring a thorough assessment without context window overload.

Does this manuscript review approach work for papers at the R&R stage?

Yes, this manuscript review approach works for papers at the R&R stage. It is specifically designed for submission-ready or revise and resubmit stages where a thorough, multi-faceted research assessment is critical.

How do I generate a prioritized revision checklist for an academic manuscript?

To generate a prioritized revision checklist for an academic manuscript, conduct a multi-lens review covering abstract, intro, methods, results, robustness, prose, and citations. The synthesized report consolidates findings into actionable revision steps.