sf-audit-code

Code review for security and architecture is performed by analyzing source files to identify bugs, injection points, unsafe dependencies, and structural weaknesses. It evaluates codebases against best practices to highlight critical flaws and deliver actionable recommendations.

An architecture review assesses project structure, modularity, and reuse potentials within a software codebase. It evaluates how components are organized and whether the design supports maintainability, identifying architectural weaknesses that may impact long-term quality.

Checking codebase compliance involves evaluating code for consistency, maintainability, and adherence to best practices. The process analyzes source files across quality, safety, and performance categories to ensure the project meets internal standards.

Automated code quality assessment can be used for backend services by running analysis on the main source file or full project directory. It evaluates the service to highlight security flaws, architectural concerns, and quality issues, generating a detailed review report.

The code review process detects potential security vulnerabilities by scanning for injection points, hardcoded secrets, and unsafe dependencies. It performs expert-level analysis to identify these safety issues alongside quality and architectural concerns.

The best way to audit a full project directory is to run an expert-level analysis on the entire codebase. This generates a detailed review report covering quality, safety, performance, and compliance to internal standards for code maintainers.