sichuan-shaanxi-comparison

Compares Sichuan and Shaanxi phone network data across seven dimensions, outputting regional evidence and analysis entries.

Updated Jun 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/bettercallfan/deerflow --skill sichuan-shaanxi-comparison
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: sichuan-shaanxi-comparison
Source: https://github.com/bettercallfan/deerflow/tree/main/skills/custom/phone-network-analysis/sichuan-shaanxi-comparison
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/bettercallfan/deerflow --skill sichuan-shaanxi-comparison

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires duckdb, pandas, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This skill compares the geodigital phone network data of Sichuan and Shaanxi in terms of object scale, risk labels, behavior patterns, shared device scale, group structure, time coverage, and representative objects, providing evidence and subsequent analysis entries for regional differences.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Geographical Comparison: Compare the object scale, risk label distribution, call behavior, shared device scale, group structure, and representative objects of Sichuan and Shaanxi.
  • Data Analysis: Analyze the size of data scale, distribution of risk objects, call activity, contact breadth, night behavior, shared devices, device pool risks, group structure, and representative objects.
  • Use Case: For example, compare the overall differences between Sichuan and Shaanxi in terms of object scale, risk object distribution, call behavior pattern, shared equipment scale, group structure, and representative objects.

Quick Start

Run the following command to compare the phone network data of Sichuan and Shaanxi:

cd /mnt/skills/custom/phone-network-analysis/sichuan-shaanxi-comparison/scripts && python3 sichuan_shaanxi_comparison_wrapper.py --dataset unified --province-a sichuan --province-b shaanxi --top-k 10

Frequently Asked Questions about sichuan-shaanxi-comparison

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I compare phone network data between two different regions?

To compare phone network data between regions, you need to analyze object scale, risk labels, behavior patterns, and group structure. This skill processes geodigital phone network data to provide evidence and analysis entries for regional differences.

What specific metrics are used for geographical comparison of phone network risk?

Geographical comparison of phone network risk evaluates object scale, risk label distribution, call behavior, shared device scale, group structure, time coverage, and representative objects. These metrics reveal regional differences in contact breadth and device pool risks.

Can I use pandas and duckdb to analyze shared device scale and group structure?

Yes, you can use pandas and duckdb to analyze shared device scale and group structure within phone network datasets. These dependencies support processing unified datasets to extract call activity, night behavior, and representative object metrics.

How do I run a data comparison script for Sichuan and Shaanxi phone networks?

You run a data comparison script for Sichuan and Shaanxi phone networks by executing the Python wrapper command with specified dataset, province, and top-k parameters. This triggers the analysis of object scale and risk object distribution.

Does this regional analysis tool support evaluating night behavior and call activity?

Yes, this regional analysis tool supports evaluating night behavior and call activity. It analyzes call activity, contact breadth, and night behavior patterns alongside shared devices and device pool risks to contrast regional data differences.

What are the limitations of analyzing regional differences using geodigital phone network data?

A limitation of analyzing regional differences using geodigital phone network data is the dependency on unified dataset availability and predefined risk labels. The analysis focuses strictly on structural metrics like shared device scale and group structure rather than real-time monitoring.