simplify

Review code changes for reuse opportunities and architecture boundary violations.

17|Updated Mar 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/alexiolan/craft-skills --skill simplify-alexiolan
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: simplify
Source: https://github.com/alexiolan/craft-skills/tree/main/skills/simplify
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/alexiolan/craft-skills --skill simplify-alexiolan

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Reviewing code changes is error-prone and time-consuming; it often misses opportunities to reuse components, introduces unnecessary complexity, and violates architectural boundaries.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Reuse check: identify shared components, utilities, and patterns that could be extracted.
  • Architecture boundary check: detect cross-module imports and potential boundary violations.
  • Quality review: assess naming consistency, error handling, and code quality, with actionable suggestions.

Quick Start

Provide the changed files or commit range to begin a rapid triage of reuse, architecture, and quality.

Frequently Asked Questions about simplify

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I find reuse opportunities and prevent code duplication when reviewing diffs?

Code review for reuse opportunities analyzes diffs and staged changes to identify shared utilities and patterns. It evaluates architecture boundaries and naming consistency to prevent duplication, returning a structured report with actionable design improvements.

What is the best way to detect architecture boundary violations in code changes?

Detecting architecture boundary violations involves assessing cross-module imports across project commits. By evaluating related modules and shared utilities, the review process identifies potential boundary violations and returns a structured report for design improvements.

Can I assess error handling and naming consistency across a specific commit range?

Yes, you can assess error handling and naming consistency by providing a specific commit range. The review applies to the changed files to evaluate overall code quality and returns actionable suggestions within a structured report.

Does this code review process require any external dependencies or components?

No, this code review process requires no external dependencies or components. You simply provide the changed files or commit range to begin a rapid triage of reuse, architecture, and quality.

When do I need to run an automated quality check on my code changes?

You need an automated quality check when reviewing code changes becomes error-prone and time-consuming. Running it on diffs and staged changes helps catch missed component reuse, unnecessary complexity, and architectural boundary violations.