Skeptic (Adversarial Reviewer)

Adversarial review identifies failure modes and missing assumptions by challenging proposed solutions to pinpoint evidence gaps and invariant violations. It analyzes specifications and tests to output a detailed position card with risks, confidence levels, and required approvals for plan validation.

Adversarial review in risk assessment is an autonomous process that challenges proposed plans without deferring conflict resolution to users. It analyzes specifications and tests to detect invariant violations, evaluate reversibility, and document required evidence to strengthen software development outcomes.

Evidence gap analysis for quality assurance is performed by challenging specification and test cards to highlight areas needing more proof. The process yields a position card detailing claims, missing assumptions, required evidence, and potential risks to validate the proposed software development plan.

Plan validation can detect invariant violations autonomously without deferring conflict resolution to users. It operates by challenging proposed solutions against established rules, outputting a detailed position card that documents risks, confidence, cost, and required approvals for the software engineering team.

You need an adversarial reviewer when a Solver proposes a new feature or plan requiring rigorous quality assurance. It is used to detect overlooked security vulnerabilities, edge cases, and evidence gaps, ensuring a more robust final product through autonomous plan validation.