skill-3-concern-match-graph

Build a match graph between official and agentic concerns with alignment judgments.

1|Updated Apr 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jinming99/reviewer-under-review --skill skill-3-concern-match-graph
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: skill-3-concern-match-graph
Source: https://github.com/jinming99/reviewer-under-review/tree/main/.claude/skills/skill-3-concern-match-graph
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jinming99/reviewer-under-review --skill skill-3-concern-match-graph

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Builds a match graph between official and agentic concerns to expose alignment gaps.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Generate explicit matches between official and agentic concerns with labels (exact, partial, or related) and alignment judgments.
  • Produce a structured match graph that includes canonical issue descriptions, severity alignment, and rationales for each edge.
  • Support research calibration and error analysis by diagnosing divergence between concern sheets.

Quick Start

Provide two YAML concern sheets (official and agentic) for a given paper/version and run this skill to produce the matches graph.

Frequently Asked Questions about skill-3-concern-match-graph

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I build a match graph to expose alignment gaps between official and agentic concerns?

To build a match graph for alignment gaps, provide two canonicalized YAML concern sheets for a given paper or version. The skill generates cross-source matches with explicit labels, severity alignment, and rationales for each edge.

What is a concern match graph and when do I need it for research calibration?

A concern match graph is a structured network mapping official issues to agentic concerns. You need it for research calibration and error analysis when diagnosing divergence between extracted concern sheets from different sources.

How do I generate cross-source matches with alignment judgments for evaluation?

Generate cross-source matches by supplying canonicalized concern statements and a defined match_graph schema. The skill processes these structured inputs to produce matches labeled as exact, partial, or related with judgment alignments.

Do I need canonicalized concern statements to produce a structured match graph?

Yes, canonicalized concern statements are required as structured inputs. The skill needs predefined canonical issue descriptions alongside a defined match_graph schema to produce accurate matches with judgment alignments.

Can I use YAML concern sheets to diagnose divergence in severity alignment?

Yes, provide two YAML concern sheets representing official and agentic perspectives. The skill produces a structured match graph that includes severity alignment data and rationales to diagnose where the concern sources diverge.

What are the limitations of using a match graph for error analysis?

The match graph depends entirely on the quality of pre-extracted concern sheets. It requires canonicalized statements and a predefined schema, meaning it cannot generate matches from unstructured text or raw paper inputs directly.