skill-check

Validate AI skills with pass/fail checks across ANALYZE, SMOKE, MANUAL, and RECOMMEND phases.

1|1|Updated Jan 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/demithras/ClearMeta --skill skill-check
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: skill-check
Source: https://github.com/demithras/ClearMeta/tree/main/.claude/skills/skill-check
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/demithras/ClearMeta --skill skill-check

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a structured, transparent framework for evaluating and validating the quality of AI skills using a layered checklist approach, replacing opaque scoring with clear pass/fail criteria.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Tiered quality checks that adapt to lifecycle status (Draft, Active, Production).
  • Epistemic tagging with L-labels to distinguish automated vs human-validated checks.
  • A unified flow covering ANALYZE, SMOKE, MANUAL, and RECOMMEND phases with CLEAR mapping.
  • History logging and integration hooks for /retro handoffs and skill-forge lifecycle management.
  • Tests.json driven validation for automated coverage.

Quick Start

Run the unified flow on a skill: /skill-check <skill-name> to begin analysis and validation.

Frequently Asked Questions about skill-check

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I validate AI skill quality using structured pass/fail criteria instead of vague scores?

Validate skill quality by applying structured checklist phases—ANALYZE, SMOKE, MANUAL, and RECOMMEND—that replace vague scores with verifiable pass/fail criteria. This enforces frontmatter validation and CLEAR-based exit reporting for consistent results.

What is epistemic labeling with L-labels for skill validation checklists?

Epistemic labeling with L-labels distinguishes automated checks from human-validated checks within the validation workflow. This tagging ensures transparent tracking of which lifecycle quality tests require manual verification versus automated execution.

How do I run a tiered validation workflow for a skill across different lifecycle stages?

Run a tiered validation workflow by executing a unified flow that adapts checks to lifecycle status—Draft, Active, or Production. The process applies consistent validation across all phases, ensuring appropriate rigor for each stage.

Does skill validation support automated test coverage driven by a tests configuration file?

Skill validation supports automated coverage through tests.json driven validation. This configuration file defines automated checks that feed into the SMOKE and ANALYZE phases, ensuring consistent, repeatable quality verification.

Can I log validation history and hand off results for lifecycle management?

You can log validation history and hand off results using integration hooks for retro handoffs and skill-forge lifecycle management. These hooks capture validation outcomes and feed them into continuous improvement tracking.

What is the best way to analyze skill quality without relying on opaque scoring systems?

The best way to analyze skill quality without opaque scoring is using a layered checklist approach with CLEAR-based exit reporting. This framework provides transparent, verifiable criteria across ANALYZE and MANUAL phases instead of arbitrary numerical scores.