skill-debate

Multi-agent AI debates coordinate models like Claude Opus, Gemini, Codex, and Sonnet to deliver diverse perspectives for critical decision-making. The system orchestrates round-based analysis and cross-advisor critique to produce a structured synthesis guiding actionable outcomes.

A four-way AI debate uses an independent moderator and three external advisors to surface well-reasoned, bias-reduced decisions for complex topics. It enforces structured context setup and quality gates, ensuring advisors deliver high-quality analyses during cross-critique rounds.

Yes, you can configure debate rounds, debate styles, and output deliverables when using multiple AI models for consensus. The system supports explicit rounds of analysis and per-round inputs, culminating in a final synthesis to inform your decisions.

To start a debate between Gemini, Codex, Sonnet, and Claude Opus, issue a prompt like /debate followed by your topic. The system then executes the structured context setup and initiates the multi-model debate process automatically.

Limitations of multi-model AI debates include dependency on the quality of per-round inputs and the strict context setup required. Users must properly configure rounds and debate styles, as the system enforces quality gates that advisors must meet to generate actionable conclusions.

Yes, the skill-debate tool works without external dependencies. It independently coordinates the four-way participation of Gemini, Codex, Sonnet, and Claude Opus, requiring only your configured debate topic and parameters to generate a structured synthesis.