skill-improve

Automates iterative Skill improvement loops by testing, fixing, and re-evaluating with static checks.

Updated Apr 22, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/brand6/Claude-Code-Game-Studios-zh-auto --skill skill-improve-brand6
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: skill-improve
Source: https://github.com/brand6/Claude-Code-Game-Studios-zh-auto/tree/main/.claude/skills/skill-improve
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/brand6/Claude-Code-Game-Studios-zh-auto --skill skill-improve-brand6

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Provides a repeatable cycle to improve a single Skill by running tests, applying fixes, and re-testing to decide whether to keep or rollback.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated test-run: executes static checks to identify failures and warnings.
  • Targeted fixes: proposes changes to failing sections without rewriting passing parts.
  • Re-test and decision: reruns static tests to decide keep or rollback based on score changes.

Quick Start

Invoke /skill-improve [skill-name] to begin the improvement loop for that skill.

Frequently Asked Questions about skill-improve

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate testing and fixing for an existing Skill?

Automate testing and fixing by running an improvement loop that executes static checks, applies targeted fixes to failing sections, and reruns tests to decide whether to keep or rollback changes.

How does the iterative skill improvement process handle static checks?

The iterative improvement process handles static checks by evaluating static scores across multiple cycles, identifying failures and warnings, and proposing targeted edits without rewriting passing parts.

Can I use this workflow to rollback changes if a fix lowers the quality-assurance score?

Yes, you can rollback changes if a fix lowers the quality-assurance score. The re-test and decision mechanism reruns static tests after applying fixes and automatically rolls back changes that do not improve the score.

What is the best way to ensure frontmatter integrity during skill improvement?

The best way to ensure frontmatter integrity is to use an automated improvement loop that validates frontmatter structure during targeted edits, ensuring repeatable re-evaluation using the Skill Testing Framework.

Do I need any external dependencies to run the retesting workflow?

No external dependencies are needed to run the retesting workflow. The improvement cycle operates independently to execute static checks, apply fixes, and re-evaluate results without requiring additional tool installations.

Why does the automated fix process avoid rewriting passing sections of a Skill?

The automated fix process avoids rewriting passing sections to preserve working logic and prevent regressions. It proposes changes strictly to failing sections identified during the static check evaluation phase.