skill-iter-tune

Run execute-evaluate-improve loops on skill definitions and generated artifacts.

76|5|Updated Jul 7, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/catlog22/pi-maestro-flow --skill skill-iter-tune-catlog22
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: skill-iter-tune
Source: https://github.com/catlog22/pi-maestro-flow/tree/main/.pi/skills/skill-iter-tune
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/catlog22/pi-maestro-flow --skill skill-iter-tune-catlog22

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps refine and improve workflow skills by repeatedly executing them, evaluating their output, and applying targeted fixes until quality reaches a desired threshold or the process converges.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Iterative execution loop: Runs a target skill against a test scenario across multiple rounds.
  • Quality evaluation: Scores results on clarity, completeness, correctness, effectiveness, and efficiency.
  • Targeted improvement: Applies only the highest-impact changes suggested by the evaluator.
  • Use case: Use it when a skill works but needs systematic tuning for better output quality, safer behavior, or stronger reliability across edge cases.

Quick Start

Use the skill-iter-tune skill to evaluate and improve a target skill against a test scenario.

Frequently Asked Questions about skill-iter-tune

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I iteratively improve workflow skills to reach a specific quality threshold?

Workflow skill optimization uses an execute-evaluate-improve loop that repeatedly runs target skills, scores generated artifacts on clarity and correctness, and applies targeted fixes until quality thresholds are met or convergence occurs.

What is the best way to evaluate and tune a chained skill workflow across edge cases?

Evaluating chained skills requires structured phase loading and multi-dimensional scoring across execution rounds, applying rollback-safe modifications to skill definitions while collecting artifacts for iterative quality assessment.

How do I set termination logic for an iterative skill tuning process?

Iterative skill tuning termination logic triggers based on defined quality thresholds, result convergence across evaluation rounds, or reaching maximum error limits during artifact generation.

When should I use an automated feedback loop for skill optimization instead of manual edits?

Automated feedback loops suit workflow skills that function but require systematic tuning for better output reliability, safer behavior, and stronger performance across edge cases.

Can I apply rollback-safe modifications when tuning a skill that produces poor artifacts?

Yes, rollback-safe modification applies targeted improvements by selecting only the highest-impact changes suggested by the evaluator during artifact analysis, preventing regression in skill definitions.

What dimensions are scored during quality evaluation of generated workflow artifacts?

Quality evaluation scores generated artifacts across five dimensions: clarity, completeness, correctness, effectiveness, and efficiency.