skill-plan-document-reviewer

Plan review verifies material claims against repository state, checks task order, dependencies, ownership, and task-local proof, then classifies findings by severity. The output is a readiness verdict: not ready, ready with required fixes, or implementation-ready.

A specification review checks goal and scope clarity, contract and identity definitions, consistency across requirements and acceptance criteria, ownership boundaries, validation quality, and unnecessary complexity. Findings are grouped by root cause rather than repeated across sections.

Skip the review for tiny, local, reversible tasks with settled behavior and obvious proof. The review cost is justified when work is cross-cutting, operational, data-sensitive, or expensive to reverse.

No, the review identifies readiness defects and proposes the smallest safe correction for each finding without silently rewriting the artifact. It does not author replacement documents, implement code, or claim behavior passes before execution.

Plan review evaluates proposed specifications and implementation plans before execution, while code review evaluates implementation diffs after changes exist. This Skill reviews proposed documents only and does not assess returned code review findings.