skill-quality-reviewer

You audit Claude skill quality by parsing SKILL.md frontmatter, validating referenced files and scripts, computing weighted scores across description, organization, style, and structure, and outputting a quality report with an improvement plan.

A skill quality review includes weighted scoring across description quality, content organization, writing style, and structural integrity, along with validation of SKILL.md YAML frontmatter and referenced scripts to produce a remediation plan.

You check SKILL.md frontmatter for missing fields by extracting and validating the YAML frontmatter against required metadata fields, verifying referenced files, and inspecting scripts for basic errors to ensure structural completeness.

You fix broken file references in a skill package by running a structural integrity check that validates referenced files against the skill directory, identifies missing paths, and generates a prioritized improvement plan with suggested edits.

Yes, you can score writing style and documentation organization automatically by applying a rubric-driven assessment that computes dimensioned scores for content organization and writing style, then generates a composite grade with actionable feedback.

The best way to review skill directories for safe sharing is to perform a pre-publication audit that assesses discoverability, documentation, organization, style, and structural completeness to identify weaknesses that block safe reuse.